Vagabond boots.

In general, I don’t consider myself a fashionista, and this is not a fashion blog. 

Which means that I am feeling pretty special today because I was able to guest write a fashion post for the blog Culture Keeper last weekend.

Confession: By “fashion post” I mean “another way to talk about my boots and Paris, two of my favorite things.”

I invite you to hop on over and check it out here. I have also reposted it below.Nice_24

It seems silly, really, to love a pair of boots this much.

After graduating from college, I packed up and moved to Paris to live The Dream, the tiny-apartment-in-the-Latin-Quarter-dream, The Dream that has lured Americans to Paris forever. In The Dream, I would wander museums with my sketch pad, bite the ends of baguettes and follow them with hunks of brie and good wine, and develop a sense of almost overwhelming superiority to the swarms of tourists who were “just there for a visit.” I would read poetry on rooftops, walk through snowy tree rows in the Luxembourg gardens, and attend as many ballets as was humanly possible. I would cultivate that certain je ne sais quoi of Parisian womanhood, that grace, fashion, and poise that they carry off so effortlessly.

All of these things did in fact happen.

But before they could happen, there was the period of Reality, the one where the French Education Nationale lost all of my paper work twice and didn’t pay me for teaching for three months. I remember standing in the grocery store rolling the 20 Euro bill in my hands, knowing that it was the last one for an indefinite period of time. Obviously, I was far from destitute, as I had any number of friends and family who would have helped out if I had asked, but I was trying desperately to exert my independence. I wasn’t the first penniless dreamer to wander the streets of Paris, and I certainly won’t be the last.

And so, in lieu of the many Parisian attractions that require money, I walked. For hours on end I would wander the streets of that elegantly aged city, letting myself get lost, and finding things that only the lost have the luck to find. I wore through two pairs of shoes in those first months, American shoes not meant for the endless hours of walking I did on uneven French streets.

I knew what I needed: boots. I was the lone sneaker-souled ballet flat in a sea of leather boots. From November till April, the Parisian women wear them like a uniform, taking on the cold weather and long days with fashionable practicality. They were in every store window, an ever-present reminder of my momentary poverty. Sometimes I would make a list in my mind of what I would buy if I ever got paid: the name brand Nutella, the mustard colored pants, and boots, THE boots, if ever I could find them. I would go into every store I passed and examine their selection, trying on the rare pair that was available in my size (most French women aren’t 5’11” with big feet), and running my hands over the supple leather. Someday soon, I would whisper, I’ll be back.

Finally, I was paid, and I was off to buy some boots. I agonized over this decision, buying several pairs only to return them a couple days later. But one day, as I was trudging home from work, I saw them. They were in the window of a little boutique in Saint-Michel, a store so unnoticeable that I can’t even remember the name. The same for the boots themselves in fact, just a perfect pair of no-name leather boots that fit like a glove. The boot search was over.

Sometimes fashion means the putting on of something, the donning of various articles of clothing. But other times fashion defines a period of our lives, or a place.  We become what we wear, or what we wear becomes us. That is what happened to me and my boots. I wore them all the time, allowing them to define my wardrobe and establish my own Parisian style. They became that winter for me. In those boots I explored that city on foot, making Paris a city that was no longer foreign. Those boots took me on pilgrimages across the entire city, down hidden rambling streets, and across every graceful bridge. Several times a day they climbed the eight flights of steps up to my tiny studio overlooking the city.  They gave me a since of belonging in the stylish throngs of the metro.

It didn’t stop in Paris. The boots carried me across other parts of France, from Nice to Bordeaux, to little villages in the country. They boots were there as I wandered in England and in Italy. In those boots, I found belonging in wandering.

Since returning from France, the boots have taken me to work in Kentucky, then explored the streets of my newest home in Washington, DC. They are my go-to for a perfect outfit, my fashion necessity.  But a lot has changed in the past six months. I got married. I decided to apply for a doctorat. I put my passport in the back corner of my desk. And the other day, I looked down while I was studying in Starbucks and say that the leather has been completely worn through on the side of my foot.

Would you judge me if I admit that I cried a little? These were my vagabond boots and their time is over.

In French, there are two words that describe wandering. The verb flâner means to stroll about, to amble along, to idle. This is a pointless sort of wandering. But the verb vagabonder is different. It means to wander, to roam, without a specific destination, but still with purpose. The last three years have been my vagabond years, my years of wandering, my years spent changing addresses, changing countries, changing states, and finally changing names. A lot has been uncertain over the past three years, but one thing was very clear: there is a sweet joy in the wandering life.

Still, you can’t do it forever. Eventually, the boots wear out. You stop wandering, look around, and realize that you’re home, you’re there, a there that you wouldn’t have found if it wasn’t for the wandering. And you’re happy to be there, so glad, but you can’t help but shed a little tear that those deliciously uncertain years of wandering are over because they were so full.

I’ll buy new boots of course, eventually.  They will most likely be objectively better than that last pair, and they will certainly last longer, as my daily mileage is substantially lower these days. But they won’t hold within their leather the streets of Paris, the beaches of Nice, the fields of Chartres. They won’t have been there the night I thought I was getting engaged only to be disappointed and trudge home in the cold. They won’t be the boots that helped me challenge the dress code at my first real adult job, or feel at home in front of a room of disinterested college students. They won’t be the boots that helped me wander my way to where I am now, a place so much better than I could have ever imagined.  They will never be my vagabond boots.

It seems silly, really, to love a pair of boots this much. But I do.

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 11 Comments

In case yesterday wasn’t enough baby for you…

… here are more pictures of sweet Emmie Rose! And since today’s photos are the ones in color, you get to see that BEAUTIFUL HEAD OF RED HAIR and more of her stylish wardrobe!

But first, more  baby toes, because I just can’t even get over them. ringtoesEmmieRose_0030Emmierosecollage2

Emmierosecollage3If at this point you need to hug your computer screen because of that SMILEY BABY REINDEER, I totally understand. But now — back to headbands.Emmierise4Emmierosecollage5And just to show that she actually is human and cries sometimes, here is how the whole three hour dress-up party ended.  Is it bad that she is so cute when she cries that I couldn’t stop taking pictures?Emmierosecollage6

See the first part of Emerson’s photoshoot here.

Now today it is back to DC and a sadly hair-bowless existence.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 7 Comments

Emerson Rosewilde

maryoliver2Remember that beautiful pregnant woman on here awhile ago? This week I finally got to see her baby! Amanda brought six-week old Emerson Rosewilde over this week so we could take some pictures… and by that I mean dress her up in every single headband she owns.

She is truly perfect, this little baby. Emmierosecollage

Keep checking for the rest of the photos, which should be up tomorrow.

*The quote on the first picture is what was on Emmie Rose’s birth announcements and it is from the poem “The Summer Day.”

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | 5 Comments

The lies we tell about marriage.

Sometimes James and I feel overwhelmed that we have been married a WHOLE SIX MONTHS (almost) because it feels like just yesterday and I still have a couple thank you notes left to write. How long do I get to claim that we are newlyweds?

Obviously, I am far from knowing everything about marriage. In fact, my knowledge is still only slightly above knowing nothing about it. Still, in these first months, I have come face to face with some of the fictions that I held of marriage, some of the lies I fostered and believed. And here is the biggest one:

All you need  is love.

Pretty sure anyone who has a happy marriage could tell you that this is ridiculous. Loving someone doesn’t mean that you will pick up your dirty laundry and put it in that special basket designed for the express purpose of holding dirty laundry, or that you will remember to change the toilet paper roll, or that your spouse will suddenly become someone perfectly attuned to your slightest mood shifts.  I would say that these first six months have showed me that respect is just as important as love, that laughter is more useful than romance, and that common interests often trump romantic prattle.

But here is the second lie I fostered about marriage, one that might seem to be the contradiction of the one above:

Marriage takes work.

Don’t get me wrong – marriage does take work, just like any relationship. You get out of it what you invest in to it, and it isn’t always going to be easy nor will it fix things. But somehow our world has developed a perception of marriage that is based in extremes. Either it is “all you need is love” or “marriage is so hard and often miserable and not at all about romance.”  Is it possible that both of these could be simultaneously right and wrong?  My big problem with the “marriage takes work” philosophy is how much it emphasizes the negative aspects of it, just like my problem with the “all you need is love” business is that it completely ignores the negative aspects.

Many people told us about all the work that marriage would be, for which I can’t really blame them, as our culture seems to have forgotten that truly good things (like marriage) are not always easy. But they also shouldn’t always be hard, always be work. I think than in our zeal to remember that marriage is something that requires a continually active investment, we have often painted it as long-suffering drudgery.

The best thing I have every heard about marriage came from one of the pastors at our church in our first premarital counseling session. He spent almost two hours going over all sorts of details about our life and our dreams for our future together. Then he told us this:

“After the Fall, the first thing that was broken as a result of sin was the relationship between man and woman, husband and wife. Through a God-centered marriage, God is able to undo the Fall one couple at a time.  Marriage is another model of redemption. Your job is to not get in the way of this redemptive work.”

This seems to me to be the good balance between all love and all work. The work of marriage is to love, not in the mushy romantic comedy sense, but in the striving to put the other first. And in this way, the work of marriage fosters greater love.

Maybe it was because we went in to it fully aware that marriage could be difficult, or maybe it was just the serendipity of life this year, but our first six months of marriage have been surprisingly and blissfully easy. Yes, James makes more laundry than I thought was humanly possible, and yes I have the world’s most high maintenance sleeping needs that we have to cope with, but those things only make marriage hard if we let them.  And for now, we’re not going to.

FamilyPhotos201220121224_0071

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 33 Comments

Kentucky Winter

KentuckyWinter

Winter in Kentucky is a wet and muddy mess. States further north get snow to hide their naked winter selves and states further south get spared some of the cold. Kentucky just gets long, cold, soggy winters broken up by snow and ice that melt back into the mud.

But it’s home and I sure do love it.

KYwinter5KYwinter4KYwinterKYwinter2KYwinter3I’m sticking around for just a couple more days before heading back to DC, and I already have that “Kentucky lump” forming in my throat, despite my love for DC and the excitement I have to get back to James, who went back yesterday.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

To love another person… Even Russell Crowe.

HAVE YOU SEEN LES MISERABLES YET?????

(Note: It is only through a sheer willpower that I am resisting the urge to write this entire post in all caps. Still, if the occasional sentence slips through in my Owen Meany type, I can’t help it. And if you don’t understand the reference I just made, stop what you are doing RIGHT NOW and go out and get John Irving’s A Prayer for Owen Meany because it will give you  THE SHIVERS.)

First, my own personal Les Misérables  backstory, because I have found that everyone who writes how they felt about the movie first must establish their right to write. (Like this article, which I liked a lot, despite not totally agreeing with it.)

Now, please know that when I say Les Misérables, I actually mean the book. Yes, it was a book once, with no music. I read it my sophomore year of high school, after having fallen in love with the characters via the Liam Neeson film version. Because if Liam Neeson has made a version of ANYTHING, I am there.  For those of you who love really long depressing French novels wih hundreds of page of [potentially pointless] description, the book is perfect. The characters are all appropriately miserable, their destinies are wonderfully doomed, the depection of Paris is perfectly grimy, and the overt narrative of redemption slaps you in the face with just the right amount of force.

Which is why I thought the movie was PERFECTION.

Before you start typing angry comments in all caps to the effect of “BUT RUSSELL CROWE CAN’T SING AND THOSE SUPER LONG CLOSEUPS WERE UNBEARABLE!!!!” hear me out. 

I have seen the musical three times, and the first time (pausing to consider typing this) I was disappointed. I thought, is this it? Yes, it was great, but it wasn’t the book, it wasn’t the anguish and triumph of humanity that I had found in the book, it wasn’t the same as the pages on which my tears had fallen.  It was too… pretty.

The second time I saw it was in Paris, from the front row, and some of Jean Valjean’s saliva actually hit me in the face. The production seemed more real and this time I fell in love with the music. By the time I saw it in DC for the third time, I was singing along and breaking out in goosebumps before every good song.

AND THEN THE TRAILER FOR THE MOVIE CAME OUT AND I CRIED EVERY SINGLE TIME I WATCHED IT. (Sorry, the all caps thing just took over. Under control now. But if you haven’t seen it yet, DO IT NOW RIGHT HERE.)

On Christmas day, the whole Stone troup went to see it and it lived up to everything I wanted from it. No, it was not the broadway musical, but it was the actual story set to the music I love. Its Hugo’s miserable characters struggling their way to redemption and love. It was dirty, and raspy, and sometimes when your life is falling apart you can’t sing pretty and THAT IS HOW IT SHOULD BE.

Yes, Russell Crowe is not the typical perfect singer that usually plays Javert. (Maybe this would be the time to admit that I also loved the bad-singing Gerard Butler as the Phantom in the 2004 Phantom of the Opera movie better than the amazing singer who played him when I saw it live. )  In a three hour movie of perfect singing, I connected more with Javert through his rasping voice and stern face than I would have if he had actually managed to hold that final death note. Throwing yourself of a bridge is rough… singing your way through it is even rougher.

Even if you didn’t like Russell Crowe, I have two words for you:  ANNE HATHAWAY. Because she was perfect. As my friend Amanda messaged me after seeing it: “SHE BECAME A PROSTITUTE IN A BED THAT LOOKED LIKE A COFFIN. Lord have mercy.” And as for those indefinte closeups that made you see every dirty poor and quivering lip, they were the cinematic incarnation of Hugo descriptions that last for HUNDREDS OF PAGES.

But what I loved most of all was how the dirtiness, flawed singing, and forced closeness to abject misery allowed the redemptive message to shine. “To love another person is to see the face of God.” When that line rang out through the theatre, after over two hours of pain, ugliness, and struggle, I think something broke within every person watching. And when they all climbed back on the barricade for the last notes, you realized, more than the Broadway musical ever showed, that Les Misérables – the book at least – isn’t about the French revolution, or some doomed love story, or even the long chase of Valjean. It is about the glorious fraternity of miserably damned humans, and the final redemption that is coming.

So for those of you who have seen it… what were your thoughts?

(Also, given our country’s recent financial issues, check this out.)

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 44 Comments

Hey there 2013.

2013There are several things that generally take place on the First Blog Post of the New Year. I could give you my top moments from the past year, like say, that time I got married, or the time that I lost my mind over Pinterest on the internet, or that time that James lost his over Instagram, or that great trip to Canada, or even that time that I made that roasted veggie frittata so good that I made 12 of them in as many weeks.

Or, I could give you my hopes for the new year, a list of lofty ideas and deep reflections. I could dream of becoming a better person, loving more fully, giving back to the community, etc.

And I’m sure that I really do want to do all of those things, but I am in a junk food coma from our New Year’s Eve Pajama Spectacular last night, where the culinary theme was “favorite slumber-party food from childhood”  (read: pizza rolls and a PARTY COOKIE, not to mention queso dip that I wanted to bathe in) and I can’t think big right now.  Thus, despite my standard distaste of New Year’s Resolutions, I am feeling compelled to make a couple. Mind you, these are the little type of resolutions, the ones that involve minute changes to life, because I think those might be the only type I’m capable of.

  1. Throw out the socks with holes. Why do we all keep those socks with holes? (At least, I hope you do, otherwise I am alone with my Valley Forge footwear.) For Christmas, James and I all but begged for socks, and now I need to actually go that final step and throw out the old ones.
  2. Do my nails on a regular basis. I could probably count the number of times my nails have looked presentable on one nubby uneven-nailed hand. And no, I’m not a biter. I am however, a neglecter who just lets the nails break at will. It’s time for a fresh start.
  3. Attend some sort of workout class. Yes, I run. But I also have a free membership to the UMD gym and they have some pretty great classes. Once, I even attended one. Then I hurt my foot and called it quits. But it’s a new year, and I might even Zumba.
  4. Watch all the seasons of 30 Rock. Because they are on Netflix and I can, and I think it is important to foster a love for the things James loves.
  5. Restart healthy eating habits. The six-months before the wedding I got pretty healthy via a loose following of the Primal Diet. But then I got married and it was all “Pie for breakfast Darling?”  and “Cookies in bed with mugs of hot cocoa – extra whip-cream please!” and sooooo many delicious brunches at Ted’s Bulletin or late night shakes at Good Stuff. Because newlywed life is delicious…and maybe not always nutritionally balanced.  New year, new grocery list.
  6. Read the Brother’s Karamazov. Because it’s on my list every year, and every year I always think that this will be the year I finally read it.  I am Sisyphus and this is my boulder.

What about you – what are your resolutions (mundane or lofty) for 2013?

(That cool image at the top was snagged from Anna’s blog, which is one of those that is like a fresh breath of air in your day. She also has the cutest dog ever, and I like to blog stalk Darcy.)

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 14 Comments

December is

December is finally leaving out the scarves and winter coats and ending evenings with hot chocolate. It’s rushing from one holiday event to the next and feeling so busy that you have to stop and wonder if it’s actually fun. It’s eggnog and soup and cider. It’s Christmas shopping and anticipation and the good kind of secret keeping. It’s hoping and wishing and planing and so much singing. It’s watching for snow and giggling over the first flakes that you try to catch in your mouth as if you were still a kid. It’s finally getting to watch Elf after waiting around all year. It’s Handel’s Messiah, Tchaikovsky’s Nutcracker, and any Christmas song by Amy Grant. It’s that clear winter smell in the air, that smell of pine and cinnamon and cold. December is never long enough.

Thisisdecember
This December was also a first Christmas tree together, a first Christmas together. It was scrambling to finish papers on Proust and anxiously watching the Fiscal Cliff debates. It was late night runs to Good Stuff and so many Starbucks salted-caramel hot chocolates. It was every song by Straight No Chaser and imaging new Christmas traditions together. It was gingerbread cookies every night and eggnog drunk exclusively out of wine glasses. It was DC December, of White House Christmas tours, and doughnut making parties, and macarons of every color. It was the first Christmas of juggling multiple families, and always missing something while frantically trying to miss nothing. It was the hours on the road, inching along through the first blizzard of the year.  It was eating so much sugar that I wanted to die, and then going back for another doughnut. It was singing, and sledding, and gift-giving, and introducing new people to old traditions. December still wasn’t long enough.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 3 Comments

Family: the ones you love annoying the most.

You may have guessed by now that the Stones are a photo-happy bunch. Christmas morning made this painfully clear as a substantial number of the gifts were photos… of ourselves. Some would call this narcissism. I would call it wringing the last drop out of the wedding photos.

And of course, Christmas means the Stone Family Christmas Photo, into which James was initiated this year.  The Christmas photo is a big deal around our house – remember that year it snowed and the year mom and I rocked the matching outfits?

Here are a couple of this year’s shots.DSC_3046 DSC_3159

bandcoverDon’t we look so happy and smiley?

Confession: very rarely do you get as annoyed with your family as when taking family photos. Here is what approximately 75% of the photos actually looked like:familyphotoreality

Because the reality is that in between portraits of familial perfection and smiling faces, there is a lot of complaining, a lot of whining, a lot of griping, and a lot of mounting annoyance with each other.

Still… I would rather be butting heads with these people than pretty much anyone else.DSC_3011bw

Sidenote: Lyman is an epic photo-bomber. Do you have one in your family, that person who has staked their identity on never smiling in photos? Behold the proof, a random sample from the family shots.Lymanphotobombs

Of course, he was nothing but smiles for these photos, the ones with his girlfriend who got to spend Christmas with us. Apparently he prefers not to sabotage all of her photos.lymanandruth

Hope you all had wonderful Christmases with your family!

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , | 3 Comments

For unto us a child is born

Christmascard christmascardback-for blogMerry Christmas from the Wegmanns! These cute little cards marched out from DC last week.  As I was designing them, James looked over my shoulder and this was his response: “Wait… so did we make those little signs and take pictures with them just so we could put them on our Christmas cards?!?” Yes. We did. Welcome to life with me.

So maybe it is just me, or maybe we are over thinking it, but we had a hard time picking a Christmas verse that didn’t sound like we were announcing a pregnancy (which we are not).   Here is the verse that I really love, so I am instead sharing it here. May you have the most blessed of Christmases!

***********

“The people who walk in darkness
will see a great light.
For those who live in a land of deep darkness,
a light will shine.
 You will enlarge the nation of Israel,
and its people will rejoice.
They will rejoice before you
as people rejoice at the harvest
and like warriors dividing the plunder.
 For you will break the yoke of their slavery
and lift the heavy burden from their shoulders.
You will break the oppressor’s rod,
just as you did when you destroyed the army of Midian.
 The boots of the warrior
and the uniforms bloodstained by war
will all be burned.
They will be fuel for the fire.

For unto us a child is born,
    unto us a son is given.
The government will rest on his shoulders.
    And he will be called:
Wonderful Counselor,Mighty God,
    Everlasting Father, Prince of Peace.”

-Isaiah 9:2-6 (NLT)

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , | 3 Comments